(The footnotes can be read clicking them.)
Work for the season began on Thursday, January 1st, 2004 and concluded on Thursday, February 12th, 2004.[1]
In
this season, work was concentrated in a group of three tombs at Dra abu
el-Naga':
The
work in the tomb of Amenemope concentrated on conservation and to this end two
measures were undertaken:
A display stand was also made for the large decorated limestone temple
blocks that were reused in the foundations of the tomb's pylon and courtyard
walls. These blocks had been taken from a structure of Hatshepsut and bear
decoration in fine raised relief.
Conservation measures were also undertaken in TT 233; in particular, the
fissures on the northern and southern end of the façade were closed to prevent
the entry of debris.
In the Broad Hall, the epigraphic records made in previous seasons of
the following were collated:
i.
i.
The text of the Opening of the Mouth on the northern side of the west wall;
ii.
ii. The painted scene to the north
of the Opening of the Mouth on the northern side of the west wall depicting
offerings being made to two bulls;
iii.
iii. The text of Book of the Dead chapter
125 on the southern half of the east wall;
iv.
iv. The texts from Book of the Dead chapters 17
and 18 on the ceiling of the southern end of the Broad Hall.
This season was the second to be conducted by the mission in TT 147. The
following activities were conducted:
A start was made on the excavation of the courtyard. It was filled with
rubble to a depth of over two meters except for the area in front of the door,
which had been cleared (probably in the early 20th century) to
provide access to the tomb when the chapel had originally been emptied and a
metal door installed.[2] (Pl. 1) Dry stone retaining walls[3] had been built to hold back the rubble to
the north and south of the cleared passageway; mixed in with the rubble on the
north side of the passage a dump containing human remains and fragments of
funerary equipment was found close to the surface. This is probably material
that was removed from the chapel during the clearing of the tomb chapel in the
early 20th century.
The excavations revealed a complex stratigraphy.
Two layers of later occupation and several flood levels interspersed with
layers of rough rubble from the mountain were identified above the
The north side of the courtyard revealed some interesting details about
the construction of the tomb chapel. In the middle of the northern half of the
façade an abandoned doorway was uncovered, which had been cut through to the
inside of the tomb but then later blocked and plastered over.[4] The nature of the gebel on the
north side of the courtyard provides an explanation for this situation; it is
composed of extremely hard limestone, which the ancient tomb builders no doubt
found too difficult to cut through and excavate and they therefore abandoned
work in this area and cut the existing doorway further south. A wall running
east-west built of mud brick and stone was then built to serve as the northern
wall of the courtyard and the area to the north of this was left in a rough
state. Remains of the east wall of the courtyard, built of mud brick, were also
uncovered. (Pl. 2) The south wall was formed partly by the gebel
(particularly at the western end) and partly built up of large boulders and
stone. Traces of plaster indicate that it had originally also been plastered.
On the south side of the courtyard, against the east wall, the remains
of a mud brick structure was found that probably served as a cult emplacement.
(Pl. 2) This conclusion was underpinned by the discovery of the opening of a
shaft situated directly in front of it. The location of the shaft was revealed
only at the end of the season, which meant that it could not be excavated, a
task that will have to be left over for the coming season.
Very little in the way of finds was found. Apart from fragmentary
pottery, the only other objects recovered that can safely be dated to the 18th
Dynasty are funerary cones (Pl. 3), a small fragment of a stele and a very
small fragment of the top of a blue glass kohl jar, decorated with vertical
yellow lines. One of the most interesting discoveries dating to this period was
a deposit of pottery jars, (Pl. 4) several containing blue and red pigment,
which was discovered under the large slab of limestone[5] that had formed part of the northern wall
of the courtyard. This must have formed part of the equipment abandoned by the
artisans who had originally painted the scenes of the tomb. The abandonment of
this material may be connected with the unfinished state of the decoration of
the tomb; that the decoration was not completed can be seen in the empty text
registers accompanying the figures on the walls at the southern end of the
Broad Hall and on the back wall of the Long Hall, as well as the incomplete
state of the ceiling decoration of the southern part of the Broad Hall.
In the dump on the northern side of the courtyard the remains of
post-18th Dynasty intrusive burials were found. One of these belonged to a wab-priest
of Amun named Khonsmose, identified by inscriptions on shabtis that can be
dated to the 21st Dynasty. (Pl. 5) The other belonged to a God's
Father of Amun named Nespautytawy, whose identity could also be identified by
inscribed shabtis of blue faience (Pl. 6) and a fragment of a painted
cartonnage (Pl. 7) that can also be dated to the 21st Dynasty. The
small secondary chamber cut into the north wall of the Long Hall may have been
the original location of these burials.
a. Repair and reconstruction of the collapsed sections of the walls.
After cleaning and consolidating with primer, work continued on the
reconstruction of the mud plaster walls of the chapel that had been damaged by
water penetration as well as human agents. The lower portion of the walls have
particularly suffered from water damage, to the extent that the thick layer of
mud plaster has dissolved away completely right down to the rock surface. The
same methods and materials were used to reconstruct the lost sections of the
walls as that employed by the original tomb builders, namely mud plaster and
chips of limestone as well as ﻪﭙﭘﺣ (hiba) mixed
with chaff ﻦﭘﺗ
(tibn). Once the building up of the lost portions of the walls has been
completed, which will take at least another season of work, they will be
covered by a final fine layer of plaster.
b. Cleaning of the wall paintings and ceiling. Work on the cleaning of the walls and their paintings was continued. In this season the walls of the northern end of the Broad Hall (Pls. 8 & 9) were cleaned as well as the ceiling of both Broad and Long Hall. (Pl 10) The soot and tar layers covering them, as well as the many mud wasp nests, were removed. The walls were first dusted; next the wasp nests were softened by the targeted application of distilled water, which enabled them to be removed without damaging the plaster under them. The method that had proved most effective in removing the soot and tar in the last season was again used, namely the application of a solution of distilled water with a small amount of ethanol and ammonia through tissue paper; the solution dissolves the tar and soot, which was absorbed into the paper. Only small amounts of the solution were needed so avoiding subjecting the plaster to excessive amounts of moisture.[6]
After the cleaning of the walls, hand copies of all the inscriptions in
the tomb were made. Preliminary study of the inscriptions undertaken in the
last season to try and identify the owner of the tomb had revealed that it was
in fact decorated for at least two different people, a Hry smsw hAy.t [n Imn.w]
m Ip.t-s.wt "Head elder of the
portal [of Amun] in Karnak", and a sS Hsb iH.w n.w [Imn.w] m Smaw mHw
"Scribe and counter of the cattle of Amun in the south and the
north"; the names of these men has systematically been erased, as were the
names of their wives. Two lots of erasure could also be identified; in the
first, the names of the tomb owners and their wives were targeted, the names,
painted in blue or black, were rubbed out or smudged without actually damaging
the plaster. The second series of erasures was more dramatic and can be dated
to the Amarna Period; words that were theologically unacceptable were
systematically targeted, in particular the name of Amun and the word
"gods". The determinative of psD.t "Ennead", ,
which is also the logograph for "gods", was similarly erased, as was
the akh-bird,
,
in the word akh "spirit-state". The erasures were effected
this time by actually cutting out the plaster on which the words appear;
although damage was thereby inflicted on the wall structure itself, the
erasures were generally done carefully and neatly, often with straight edges.
In the previous season, preliminary study of the inscriptions, before
the cleaning of the walls had been completed, had given the impression that the
northern half of the tomb was systematically decorated for the "Head elder
of the portal" and the southern half for the "Scribe and counter of
the cattle of Amun". After the cleaning of the northern end of the Broad
Hall the picture is clearer and it has been revealed that the " Scribe and
counter of the cattle of Amun" also appears prominently in the northern
half of the Broad Hall, in particular to the north of the doorway on the east
wall where, as in the parallel position on the wall to the south of the door,
he appears, along with his wife, as a large-scale figure presenting offerings
to Amun at the Beautiful Festival of the Valley. He is thus the senior and
dominant of the two tomb owners.
In the report on our activities in the previous season (November –
December 2002) the hope was expressed that future excavations would produce
inscribed finds that may provide information on the tomb's owners. In this
season, in the course of the excavation of the courtyard, one type of artefact
was recovered that does enable us to plausibly identify the main tomb-owner, namely
the person who held the title "Scribe and counter of the cattle of
Amun". As mentioned above, a number of 18th Dynasty funerary
cones were found, the majority of which belong to an individual called
Neferrenpet. [7]
There were two types of cone; one is inscribed "Wab-priest of Amun and Counter of the
Cattle of Amun, Neferrenpet".[8] (Pl. 3 a.) The other bears the
inscription
"Keeper of the Storeroom(s) of Amun and
Wab-priest of Khons Neferrenpet".[9] (Pl. 3 b.)
As
evidence, funerary cones that are no longer still in their original position,
namely embedded in the façade of a tomb, need to be considered with caution
since they are often found in locations far removed from the tomb to which they
originally belonged.[10] However, the cones in question were
found in various archaeological contexts in the courtyard, including in levels
very close to the original floor level and near the tomb's facade, which makes
it unlikely that they are stray finds and makes it almost certain that they
belong to the tomb. The one factor that might make one hesitate identifying the
Neferrenpet of the cones with the "Scribe and Counter of the cattle of
Amun" of the tomb is that the title "Scribe" does not appear on
the cones and that the titles "Wab-priest of Amun", "Keeper of
the Storeroom(s) of Amun" and "Wab-priest of Khons" do not
appear in the tomb. The lack of the title "scribe" on the cones is
not too great a problem since there is often a discrepancy between the titles
on a tomb's cones and the titles in the tomb's wall decoration. The lack of the
titles "Wab-priest of Amun", "Keeper of the Storeroom(s) of
Amun" and "Wab-priest of Khons" in the tomb may be fortuitous;
the decoration of the tomb was not completed, as the abandoned paint pots in
the courtyard and the empty register lines, prepared to take inscriptions,
clearly indicate. We can therefore conclude with a fair degree of certainty
that the primary owner of TT 147 was a man called Neferrenpet. Hopefully future
work on the tomb, in particular the excavation of the funerary apartments, will
confirm the above conclusion and also provide evidence for the identity of the
"Head elder of the portal".
[1] The
other members of the team were S.Binder, J. Brophy, Magdy el-Badry Ahmed, L.
Donovan, S. Edwards,
[2]
This must have happened prior to 1913; in A.H. Gardiner and A. Weigall, A
Topographical Catalogue of the Private Tombs of Thebes (
[3] The
northern retaining wall is visible in Pl. 1.
[4] The
opening was re-sealed by us and can be seen at the right edge of Pl. 2.
[5] The
limestone slab is visible in Pl. 2 immediately in front of the door to the
tomb.
[6] As
in the last season, I would again particularly like to record the excellent
work of the SCA restorer, Mr Ali Abdallah, whose contribution, dedication and
commitment to the work were outstanding.
[7] In
all, sixteen cones with legible inscriptions were found, of which 13 belong to
Neferrenpet. The other three are examples of N. de G. Davies & Macadam Corpus
of Funerary Cones nos. 101 (the wab-priest of the king Amenhotep),
172 (the scribe 'Annen) and 198 (the acolyte of Amun Amenhotep son of K…gsy).
[8] N.
de G. Davies & Macadam Corpus of Funerary Cones no. 464; five cones
of this type were found: TT 147:44, 45, 66, 67 and 94.
[9]
Davies & Macadam No. 459. Eight examples of this type were found: TT
147:34, 59, 60, 61, 65, 68, 92 and 93.
[10] As
the presence of Davies & Macadam nos. 101, 172 and 198 in the courtyard of
TT 147 indicate; cones of Neferrenpet have also been found at the bottom of the
hill in the courtyard of TT 11 (personal communication from Dr. Jose Galan).